Evolutionary theories and the philosophy of science

نویسندگان

چکیده

Philosophical theories proceeding from the history of physical-mathematical sciences are hardly applicable to analysis biosciences and evolutionary theory, in particular. This article briefly reconstructs theory beginning with its roots 19th century up ultracontemporary concepts. Our objective is outline dynamics Darwinism anti-Darwinism perspective philosophy science. We begin arguments E. Mayr against applicability T. Kuhn’s scientific revolutions biology. emphasized that Darwin’s publication Origin Species 1859 caused a genuine revolution biology, but it was not Kuhnian revolution. Darwin coined several comprising complex theoretical system. defined five most crucial these theories: evolution as such, common descent all organisms including man, gradualism, multiplication species explaining organic diversity, and, finally, natural selection. Distinguishing great significance because their destiny biology substantially differed. The acceptance one by majority community does necessarily mean others. Another argument proved two which referred First Second Darwinian Revolutions. Revolution happened already 20th himself active participant. Both followed concept period between can be no way described “normal science” terms. reconstruction support Mayr’s anti-Kuhnian arguments. Furthermore, we claim “evolution theory” interpreted terms modified research programmes Imre Lakatos, though “purity”, rather combined certain aspects Marxian-Hegelian dialectics.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Theories of Reference and the Philosophy of Science

The theses of meaning-variance and incommensurability of Kuhn and Feyerabend have consequences which are not easy to digest: that it does not make sense to say that a later scientific theory is more adequate, or is closer to the truth, than an earlier one, and that there is therefore no genuine progress in science. Now it is widely agreed that there must be something seriously wrong with this v...

متن کامل

From philosophy to science (to natural philosophy): evolutionary developmental perspectives.

This paper focuses on abstraction as a mode of reasoning that facilitates a productive relationship between philosophy and science. Using examples from evolutionary developmental biology, I argue that there are two areas where abstraction can be relevant to science: reasoning explication and problem clarification. The value of abstraction is characterized in terms of methodology (modeling or da...

متن کامل

a fundamental study of "histiriographic metafiction", and "literary genres", as introduced in "new historical philosophy", and tracing them in the works of julian barnes.

abstract a fundamental study of “historio-graphic metafiction” and “literary genres”, as introduced in “new historical philosophy”, and tracing them in the works of julian barnes having studied the two novels, the porcupine and arthur & george, by julian barnes, the researcher has applied linda hutcheon’s historio-graphic metafictional theories to them. the thesis is divided into five cha...

15 صفحه اول

TARGET ARTICLE Are Evolutionary Explanations Unfalsifiable? Evolutionary Psychology and the Lakatosian Philosophy of Science

Are the methods and strategies that evolutionary psychologists use to generate and test hypotheses scientifically defensible? This target article addresses this question by reviewing principles of philosophy of science that are used to construct and evaluate metatheoretical research programs and applying these principles to evaluate evolutionary psychology. Examples of evolutionary models of fa...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: ??????? ?????-?????????????? ????????????. ????????? ? ??????????????

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['2542-2278', '2541-9382']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.204